The Fault In Our Stars By John Green

Agustia Anusi1 Feby Meuthia Yusuf2 Helmita3


The problem in this thesis is the irony of love story between two human beings who are in love, the irony occurs when the fate has separated their love story. The tragic story of Hazel and Augustus’ love is inspired by the author’s visit to chronic cancer patients at the hospital, about their hopes and love that would be impossible to achieve.

In this writing, library research is taken as the method of data collection. As for data analysis method, the writer performs systematic procedures by understanding the novels, the characters of Hazel and Augustus, as well as the structural theory. Data collection technique uses documentation technique in finding relevant data to the subject of analysis. In data analysis techniques, the writer uses structural technique by analyzing the novel based on the elements that shape them.

The results of research in this thesis are: 1) destiny seems to separate the love story of Hazel and Augustus, where Hazel is suffered from the chronic cancer while Augustus is in good shape, but Augustus is willing to love Hazel until the end of life, 2) destiny continues to play their love story, this time it is August that suffers from chronic illness and is on the verge of death, while Hazel’s condition is getting better. This time, it is Hazel that loves Augustus until the end of his life, and faithfully accompanied him; 3) the irony has occurred in the love story of Hazel and Augustus where the unfair destiny has turned the deaths and hopes on both of them, the one who is almost dies has become better, on the contrary the one who is healthy has been picked by the death in the end. The love story and hope of being together have been ironically played by the fate.

Keywords: love story, human





Abrams. M. H. and Harpham G. G. 2009. A Glossary of Literary Terms. London: Wadsworth

Attardo, Salvatore. 1999. Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness (Journal of Pragmatics). Accessed on January 26th, 2017 at 11:05 PM.

Barthes. Roland. 1992. The Structuralist Activity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press

Bernet, Morton and Berman Burton. 1991. An Introduction to Fiction. Boston: Little Brow and Company

Booth. W. C. 1994. A Rhetoric of Irony. University of Chicago Press

Cohen and Shire, 1998. A Theoretical Analysis of Narrative Fiction. New York: Prentice Hall, Inc

Colebrook. Claire. 2004. Irony. New York: Routledge

Farzaneh. Dastmard. 2012, The Relationship between Psychology and Literature: Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research.,%202(9)9420-9423,%202012.pdf. accessed on January 26th, 2017 at 11:03 PM.

Guerin. L. Wilfred. 1996. A Handbook of Critical Approach to Literature New York: Row Publisher

Hood, Dave. 2010. How to Analyze Fiction. 2010/01/28/how-to-analyze-fiction/. Accessed on January 6th, 2017 at 06:57 PM.

Kenny. William. 1996. How to Analyze Fiction. New York: Monarch Press

Lester. David. 1997. Psychology and Literature: Journal of Psychology, a Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior. accessed on January 6th, 2017 at 06:57 PM.

Lionel. Menasche. 1993. Writing a Research Paper. New York: The University of Pittshburgh Ltd

Long. William J. 1999. History of English Literature. New York: Eeinn Press

Luxemburg. Jan Van. 1995. Pengantar Ilmu Sastra. Gramedia:  Jakarta

Moghaddam. Fathali M.  2004. From ‘Psychology in Literature’ to ‘Psychology is Literature’: Sage Journals. 0959354304044922. accessed on January 26th, 2017 at 11:05 PM.

Pexman, Penny M. 2008. It’s Fascinating Research: The Cognition of Verbal Irony. contents. Accessed on January 26th, 2017 at 11:05 PM.

Pradopo. Rahmat Djoko. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogjakarta: Hanindita Ghasa Widia

Reyes, Antonio, 2012. From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. publication/257026048_From_humor_recognition_to_irony_detection_The_figurative_language_of_social_media. Accessed on January 26th, 2017 at 11:05 PM.

Robert. Edgard V. 1990. Writing Theme about Literature. New York: Prentice Hall, Inc

Sayuti. Suminto A. 1994. Teori Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Masyarakat Poetika Indonesia

Tarigan. Henry Guntur. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa IKAPI

Williams. Raymond. 1996. Modern Tragedy. London: Chatto & Windus